Model Revision Comparison

Sverre

Hi. I have a new revision where there is 1 new object and 1 object that`s been moved/modified. The ruleset finds the new object (Added 1) But not the one modified. It detects all the objects in the model as modified. Anyone that has experienced this?

Regards

Flem

YUSOF

Hi @Sverre. I have encountered the same thing too last 2-3 months. I have forwarded this issue to Solibri and they are fixing it, not sure when exactly it will be resolved.

Pasi Paasiala

@YUSOF did you provide test files as well? Did you contact Solibri, or did you report it here in Society? I couldn’t find the latter, if you did.

@Sverre @YUSOF have you tried ticking/unticking the “Identify components only with GUID” option? How does it affect the results?

YUSOF

@Pasi-Paasiala yes we have provided the test files to Solibri and we are in contact directly with the support team. Indeed I did not create this issue in the Society.

paola bronzo

Hi @Solibrians,
I use this post already open because I would like to ask for explanations on the behavior of the rule “Model Comparison”.
My goal is to compare two models, without using the GUID, but only the geometry/location. If “the identify components only with GUID” checkbox is not active, I would expect to find the “distribution element” objects within the “Modified” category result.
However this does not happen.
Why do I find them in the “Added” category result? I suspect that the rule always considers the GUID, even if the checkbox is not active. If this were the case it would be useless to have put the option. Are there any improvement plans on this rule?
Thanks

model comparison.JPG

Here the model Demo_Solibri Office_Model Comparison+Clashes.smc

Matti

“I suspect that the rule always considers the GUID” this is true.

“the identify components only with GUID”

ON: the rule uses only GUIDs to find the peer components
OF: the rule uses GUIDs AND other ways (location, geometry, etc…) to find the peer components

paola bronzo

Hi @Matti-Kannala,

thanks for your reply.
I also noticed that although the GUID is different, if the geometry and location of the two objects are almost the same, I get the “Modified” category in the results. So I was wondering what the geometric tolerance is set within the rule for which the element is recognized as modified and not removed/added.

Matti

Location tolerance is 1cm.
There are also other means for finding the peer component.

paola bronzo

@Matti-Kannala other means? what are you referring to?

Matti

@paola-bronzo said in Model Revision Comparison:

@Matti-Kannala other means? what are you referring to?

The rule uses many other ways (if allowed) than GUID to find the peer component for modified cases e.g:

The components are having exactly the same geometry
the doors/windows filling the same opening
the components are clashing mostly