Geometrical Representation IFC4

JSN

More geometrical Issues with IFC4 …

Should be as depicted in other viewers

Should be BREPs … bty, the german translation for the geometry mode actually reads a bit odd.

Pasi Paasiala

@JSN Can you share the IFC file, please. Also if you have a better suggestion for the translation of Boundary Representation.

JSN

@Pasi-Paasiala

Sent it to @Matti-Kannala.

Regarding the term I would say “Begrenzungsflächenmodell (BREP)” including the abbreviation would be more accurate and familiar. Actually from my perspective I would say “Boundary Representation” is even more commonly used then the translation and “BREP” should be indicated.

E.g. also in Archciad ther is only written “BREP” in the geometry conversion settings.

Matti

The IFC model contains unsupported IFCBSPLINESURFACEWITHKNOTS surface geometries.
We are currently working on to support these geometries.

paola bronzo

Hi @Matti-Kannala ,
unfortunately there are still representation problems on some ifc4.
Is it possible to have a list of ifc4 entities that are not yet supported in Solibri?
This could help us know what to model and not to model if solibri is included in our workflow.
Thank you