Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse
Solibri Society Forum
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Names of ITOs are getting trunca...

Names of ITOs are getting trunca...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
25 Posts 6 Posters 9.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JSNJ Offline
    JSNJ Offline
    JSN
    replied to Matti on last edited by
    #12

    @Matti-Kannala

    The tooltip is a great help but the titles are still getting truncated - at least for me.
    I can only repeat what others have already have mentioned:

    I don’t want that I need to view the tooltip to read the title. The title needs to be visible right away, because otherwise it would only add more time to choose your ITO. For the description the tooltip can be used, but it needs the improvements that @Mario mentions.
    The best for me would be that the width of the ITO chooser can be changed by the user, and that it retains that width.!

    f54cbd86-8d06-4ccc-9df6-4c340ad07e4c-image.png

    MattiM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • MattiM Offline
      MattiM Offline
      Matti Solibrians
      replied to JSN on last edited by
      #13

      @JSN

      We did improve it a bit from 25 to 35 letter. Yes it is still truncated.
      This was just small and easy improvement, not full fix.

      JSNJ 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • JSNJ Offline
        JSNJ Offline
        JSN
        replied to Matti on last edited by
        #14

        @Matti-Kannala said in Names of ITOs are getting trunca...:

        This was just small and easy improvement, not full fix.

        So this means it is still on the list?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • JSNJ Offline
          JSNJ Offline
          JSN
          replied to Matti on last edited by
          #15

          @Matti-Kannala

          What about a totally independent window for all available ITOs where someone can choose it’s own size and has a much better overview. Switching between the various ITOs would be much faster as well. Probably it is even possible with the API to create such a view on my own. There is a getItoDefinitions method but no setItoDefinition one and I guess ‘calculate’ does not exactly do what I have in mind. Still, had not time to try it out so would be good to know if this could work.
          https://solibri.github.io/Developer-Platform/latest/javadoc/com/solibri/smc/api/ito/InformationTakeoff.html

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Offline
            P Offline
            Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            I created an internal issue about this. Let’s see what we can do.

            JSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • JSNJ Offline
              JSNJ Offline
              JSN
              replied to Pasi Paasiala on last edited by
              #17

              @Pasi-Paasiala said in Names of ITOs are getting trunca...:

              I created an internal issue about this. Let’s see what we can do.

              What can be done?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • P Offline
                P Offline
                Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                This might be fixed in the next release. An issue is progress. Fingers crossed.

                JSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • JSNJ Offline
                  JSNJ Offline
                  JSN
                  replied to Pasi Paasiala on last edited by JSN
                  #19

                  @Pasi-Paasiala said in Names of ITOs are getting trunca...:

                  This might be fixed in the next release. An issue is progress. Fingers crossed.

                  Eureka! Even better if also this could be implemented >>>

                  What about a totally independent window for all available ITOs where someone can choose it’s own size and has a much better overview. Switching between the various ITOs would be much faster as well. Probably it is even possible with the API to create such a view on my own. There is a getItoDefinitions method but no setItoDefinition one and I guess ‘calculate’ does not exactly do what I have in mind. Still, had not time to try it out so would be good to know if this could work.

                  https://solibri.github.io/Developer-Platform/latest/javadoc/com/solibri/smc/api/ito/InformationTakeoff.html

                  An addtionaly method in the interface for setItoDefinition would be highly appreciated. Calculate only seems to switch to a given <ItoDefinition> if there really was a recalculation performed … so my workaround to improve the usability for working with lots of ITOs is not really satisfying me so far.

                  Btw, the returned descriptiption is returning html, not really a problem …

                  ecf87a33-391c-4a67-803b-4436ea001c38-image.png

                  … but maybe more convenient if it is plain text by default?

                  d94217cc-3a3c-45db-95b3-5d26ae3e993f-image.png

                  And the names are ignoring some special chars either like the _?

                  1712c9dc-ef56-4b66-9d19-c9bd035a639f-image.png

                  JSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • JSNJ Offline
                    JSNJ Offline
                    JSN
                    wrote on last edited by JSN
                    #20

                    Not sure where I have mentioned it before but as switching through lots of ITOs is, … well, like it is, I would definitely favor buttons to at least be able to quickly switch between the previous and the next ITO …

                    image.png

                    Would have tinkered it togehter myself but the above explains what’s keeping me from it …

                    An addtionaly method in the interface for setItoDefinition would be highly appreciated. Calculate only seems to switch to a given <ItoDefinition> if there really was a recalculation performed … so my workaround to improve the usability for working with lots of ITOs is not really satisfying me so far.

                    JSNJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • JSNJ Offline
                      JSNJ Offline
                      JSN
                      wrote on last edited by JSN
                      #21

                      Having to work with ITOs a lot again and it reminds me everytime of those things … in a file with lots of ITOs (even if they are well named and structured, which is truly not always the case) it feels like looking through a tiny keyhole. Due to the lack of ITO-management features, truncated information, a tiny dropdown menu, missing navigation features (< and >) lots of repetive tasks and clicks are necessary … even if someone has three screens on his desk the software would not allow him to unleash the full potentials and clearly limits us here.

                      40593e6d-cd72-466e-869c-8d84f514dc68-image.png

                      E.g. think about deleting many ITOs in a smc file with lots of ITOs which have been created over the time. It feels like a punishment as I always have to select the next one from the drop down menu first once one gets removed as it always automatically jumps back to the list. Please make this better or at least add more methods to the API so that I can at least build my own ITO-Management-View!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      4
                      • P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        @JSN Thanks for making this issue clear with the illustration! I’ve reported an enhancement request for this.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • JSNJ Offline
                          JSNJ Offline
                          JSN
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          Any chances to see improvements on this matter with the upcoming release?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • JSNJ Offline
                            JSNJ Offline
                            JSN
                            replied to JSN on last edited by
                            #24

                            @JSN said in Names of ITOs are getting trunca...:

                            Not sure where I have mentioned it before but as switching through lots of ITOs is, … well, like it is, I would definitely favor buttons to at least be able to quickly switch between the previous and the next ITO …

                            532fcf50-254e-4f80-885b-bc13499da1dc-image.png

                            Would have tinkered it togehter myself but the above explains what’s keeping me from it …

                            An addtionaly method in the interface for setItoDefinition would be highly appreciated. Calculate only seems to switch to a given <ItoDefinition> if there really was a recalculation performed … so my workaround to improve the usability for working with lots of ITOs is not really satisfying me so far.

                            its-been84years-titanic.gif

                            … not in real life, but for sure when it comes to software engineering, project management and cat years.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            4
                            • JSNJ Offline
                              JSNJ Offline
                              JSN
                              replied to JSN on last edited by
                              #25

                              @JSN said in Names of ITOs are getting trunca...:

                              An addtionaly method in the interface for setItoDefinition would be highly appreciated. Calculate only seems to switch to a given <ItoDefinition> if there really was a recalculation performed … so my workaround to improve the usability for working with lots of ITOs is not really satisfying me so far.

                              At the very least, please allow us to improve the usability ourselves.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories