Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse
Solibri Society Forum
  1. Home
  2. General Discussion
  3. Rule 9/3.1 --> what did I wrong?

Rule 9/3.1 --> what did I wrong?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
5 Posts 4 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sander E
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I used the role 9/3.1 to check if all components with bricks used in the classification.

    The results in the rol is ‘ok’ , but it is not!
    What is giong wrong here?

    regelset 9-3.1.smc Rule 9.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Harmen JorritsmaH Offline
      Harmen JorritsmaH Offline
      Harmen Jorritsma
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @sander-Eikelboom
      Did you use a gatekeeper in top of the rule tree?
      If you did, try to remove it and check again.

      Did you use 9.12?
      I discovere a few weeks ago, when you use a gatekeeper in 9.12, the rules after the gatekeeper gives a false positive OK. When i delete the gatekeeper, the rules do it right again.
      I reported this bug and @Solibrians are working on it, but it is very sensitive to errors.
      When you don’t discover this bug, and you trust on the outcom of the ruleset, there can al lot of things go wrong.

      Met vriendelijke groet,
      Harmen Jorritsma

      BIM regisseur Van Wijnen Amsterdam
      Diemerhof 32 | 1112 XN Diemen | KvK 32129744

      020 -36 44 000 | 06-83 15 66 88 | LinkedIn | www.vanwijnen.nl
      Volg ons op Facebook en Twitter

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • BvanDalsumB Offline
        BvanDalsumB Offline
        BvanDalsum
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @sander-Eikelboom

        What if you fill in the classification as the property, and the allowed property the material “baksteen”
        baksteen_1.png

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Sander E
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Thanks for the answers.

          @Harmen-Jorritsma , I have solibri 9.12, but its not a gatekeeper.
          @BvanDalsum, If I fill in the de classification as a property, the rule works, but it is not result I want.

          The problem in this case is that we have a classification ‘metselwerk’ (brickworks) and with this classification we generate a Information takeoff.

          Last weak we discovered a difference in the ITO and the manual calculation. After some searching we saw that the classification was not full with ‘metselwerk’.
          So after that we make a checking rule. This checking rule is for all architects. And we see a lot of names for metselwerk.

          Anyway, in the maintime I used another ruleset (230). And I and I reported to our retailer (kubus Netherlands).

          I’ll keep you posted when I know more.

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • hkringsKUBUSH Offline
            hkringsKUBUSH Offline
            hkringsKUBUS
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @sander-Eikelboom I send you a response to your e-mail on why the rule is not working.

            Summary for whom is interested: With the original setup none components were checked. I looked like rule 9 requires a component match for both Components to Check and Allowed Property values.
            In this specific case is therefore the solution to add a row to the allowed property values for the component type “object”.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1

            Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories