Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse
Solibri Society Forum
  1. Home
  2. Comments & Feedback
  3. Tech Talks
  4. Why is the stair wrong?

Why is the stair wrong?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Talks
9 Posts 4 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • agroniA Offline
    agroniA Offline
    agroni
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi,
    can anyone help me and explain why the stair does not fulfill the size of the landing?
    The ruleset is set to 900mm and the landing is much bigger than that…

    626299eb-1e21-47d5-ab82-93c81fb12ad5-grafik.png

    I actually get for all the stairs the same problem!
    Any clues?

    AllesWirdGut Architecture
    www.awg.at

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • hkringsKUBUSH Offline
      hkringsKUBUSH Offline
      hkringsKUBUS
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Often (normally?) the landings are ifcSlab. Maybe the rule checks only ifcSlab within a ifcStair and your landing does have a different entity or the stair is not an assembly.
      Just an initial guess

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • agroniA Offline
        agroniA Offline
        agroni
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        thanks @hkringsKUBUS bus sadly was not the case.
        You are correct that the middle landing is an IfcSlab Type LANDING, which is also in my case:

        44c09ac5-ea3d-4538-ae55-e65d57a82c5e-grafik.png

        Even solibri detects this part of the object as a landing, because in the error message (first post) he mentions the “Zwischenpodest” (ger. stair landing). It does not matter if the geometry of the landing is just rectangular or not, he cannot find the correct dimensions of it, hence resulting in an error.

        Does anyone else experience the same problem?
        @Solibrians are we dealing here with a bug?

        AllesWirdGut Architecture
        www.awg.at

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • agroniA Offline
          agroniA Offline
          agroni
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          anyone?
          any feedback on this case?
          any experience with this rule?

          AllesWirdGut Architecture
          www.awg.at

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • agroniA Offline
            agroniA Offline
            agroni
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Solibrians
            any chance on getting some feedback about this case? On my tasks it is still open and getting tons of false reports from Solibri.
            Or does the silence mean that I should maybe just turn off this option an simply ignore it?

            AllesWirdGut Architecture
            www.awg.at

            chrisC 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • chrisC Offline
              chrisC Offline
              chris
              replied to agroni on last edited by
              #6

              @agroni How do you modeled the stairs in your software (Archicad 😉 )? Ist this one element? Did you check to seperate the stair in three parts?

              agroniA 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • agroniA Offline
                agroniA Offline
                agroni
                replied to chris on last edited by
                #7

                @chris
                Yes, it is in Archicad 🙂 and it is modeled as one piece.
                Yes, we also have a project where stairs are composed out of two stair flights and one landing in between modeled separately. In this situation, there is no error.

                I would like to know if Solibri is checking the IfcSlab TYPE LANDING with this rule, or how is it establishing that the landing size is not fulfilled. Based on what parameters or geometry. In our case, we will almost never have a mid-stair landing that is modeled separately, especially in the early design phases. It is simply not efficient to work with three elements instead of one. Therefore, it would be really helpful if Solibri could check the mid-landing not matter how it is modelled. In my opinion the key aspect for checking should be IfcSlab TYPE LANDING.

                AllesWirdGut Architecture
                www.awg.at

                chrisC 1 Reply Last reply
                2
                • chrisC Offline
                  chrisC Offline
                  chris
                  replied to agroni on last edited by
                  #8

                  @agroni Maybe it is how the Ifc Geometry is exported from Archicad… I had similar issues with Elements from Archicad (Stair, Beams, Facade…)

                  But yeah, @Solibrians, any suggestions on that?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    jacob.wangara Solibrians
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Hello @agroni ,

                    Please open a support ticket for this by sending an email to [email protected] and attach the files in question. we’ll get back to you after further investigations as to what this issue could be.
                    On behalf of Solibri team.
                    Thank you.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0

                    Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB

                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories