Skip to content
  • Categories
Collapse
Solibri Society Forum
  1. Home
  2. Comments & Feedback
  3. Tech Talks
  4. Intersection volume not correct bug?

Intersection volume not correct bug?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Tech Talks
7 Posts 2 Posters 1.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • W Offline
    W Offline
    Wing Mang
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I run a simple general intersection rule, between a space and 4 walls.

    Each wall is 2000mm long, 1000mm tall, and 1mm thick.
    The 4 walls are totally inside the space, so I would have assumed the intersection volume is equal to the total wall volumes.
    But it turns out the intersection volumes is reported only 50% of total volume.

    Is this a bug or am I missing something?

    Attached a screenshotScreenshot 2023-02-18 at 11.38.12 PM.png

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Offline
      P Offline
      Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @Wing-Mang If you have a simple model that you could share, it’d help to find out what’s going wrong. If you don’t want to share it here in the forum, you can send an email to [email protected].

      W 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • W Offline
        W Offline
        Wing Mang
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        yes sure. I saved the elements in separate file and here are the Archicad file (v26), the exported IFC, and SMC file with checking result.
        The error is reproduced in this SMC file.

        Thanks!

        Solibri_Intersection_volume test.zip

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Offline
          W Offline
          Wing Mang
          replied to Pasi Paasiala on last edited by
          #4

          @Pasi-Paasiala Hi! is there any finding of what could be the problem?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Offline
            P Offline
            Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Wing-Mang This is an ancient thing. The intersection volume is halved. The reasoning being that otherwise the sum of intersection volume could be larger than the total volume of the components. Maybe it is time to change this.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Offline
              P Offline
              Pasi Paasiala Solibrians
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Wing-Mang I think the original reasoning for this is the following scenario:

              You have intersections in slabs and you want to order concrete to be poured for the slabs to the site. You can deduct the volume of the intersections from the amount of concrete you order to the site. If you’d have the intersection calculated fully for each component, then you’d deduct too much concrete.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • W Offline
                W Offline
                Wing Mang
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                @Pasi-Paasiala Thanks for your explanation on the reasoning behind.

                However, it’s quite misleading and not intuitive. I wouldn’t have doubted the intersection volume if I was not doing some testing. The figure obviously differs from that in the description of the rule result, even though they both seem to refer to the same thing “volume of the intersections / intersection volume”.

                Highly suggest the intersection volume in the report should not be halved.🤔

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories