Skip to content

General Discussion

Let's talk Solibri!

1.1k Topics 5.0k Posts
  • parameters

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    O

    HI @majkanovic ,
    thank you for your reply

    Greetings,
    Oussama

  • Windows 11 multiple Instances of Solibri

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    789 Views
    JSNJ

    If you find a solution that allows both let me know. For the moment I think you have to change it every time.

  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    jakub.rusinJ

    @JSN @Pasi-Paasiala @manuel-furia
    Seems that some Properties have this problem and other don’t
    Layer, Building, Discipline, Federated Floor (and possible other) are not editable.
    Application, Name (and others) are editable.
    I will create a ticket for this.

  • parameters

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    632 Views
    O

    i have about 400 new parameters, from what i understood from the rule 203 that we can check attributs if they exist or not but how can we check that all the parameters are integrated ?

    thank you for your reply

  • Exceptions in General intersection rule

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    P

    @twosk if you can provide us with a simple example (preferably IFCs + ruleset, a .smc file works also) to duplicate the issue of intersections that should be excluded in your opinion, it’d help us to find the problem or help you in setting up your rule.

  • Components to Be Checked Decomposes logic?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    615 Views
    L

    Got it working, but had to use two rows
    9b5a53c1-14ad-4c05-9f25-f3b6259ef7dd-image.png

  • Where do I find my previous post?

    Locked Solved
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    648 Views
    S

    Thank you mr!

  • Autorun filepath

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    1k Views
    MattiM

    Just tested this a bit:
    By using west european encoding I got “é” working in the path:

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

    Check the auorun log for details:

    C:\Program Files\Solibri\SOLIBRI-9.13.5\log\autorun.log

    When there is UTF-8 as encoding and the file is not UTF-8 encoded then you will get this kind of error:

    “org.jdom2.input.JDOMParseException: Error on line 6 of document file:/C:/Users/Downloads/autorun-test.xml: Invalid byte 2 of 3-byte UTF-8 sequence.”

  • My rule misses an obvious clash

    1
    2 Votes
    1 Posts
    300 Views
    No one has replied
  • Markups&dims remove/edit individual

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    Mats_KnutssonM

    @jakub-rusin said

    Hope that helps at least somewhat 🙂

    Haha yes at least I know how it works (or not works…) 🙂

  • Error while opening IFC 4.3 file

    Unsolved
    6
    2 Votes
    6 Posts
    2k Views
    paola bronzoP

    Hi @Paul-Linder , thanks for your reply.
    Is a very important topic.
    Fingers crossed 🤞 for beginning of next year.

  • Issue elements report - presentation

    3
    2 Votes
    3 Posts
    1k Views
    paola bronzoP

    Hi,
    I return to the topic to find out if improvements on the critical elements report are in the Solibri plans.
    I agree with @le_branquinho.
    The solution to insert result components in the selction basket is the workaround we now use… but it is not so immediate, there is also the risk that non-critical elements may end up in the selection basket. Surely the “export to excel” function would be more convenient for the user.
    It would also be very helpful if there was a choice to export components in separate rows.
    This makes the job easier for the BIM Specialist who then has to copy and paste the ID into the authoring software. Unfortunately, not everyone uses BCF report so the excel format is still widely used for communication.
    report idea.jpg

  • numerical value classification

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    308 Views
    No one has replied
  • BCF Live Connector changes viewpoint order

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    249 Views
    No one has replied
  • Test for distance between Opening by MEP and slab, advanced

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    275 Views
    No one has replied
  • Model Origin to Insertion Point Distances in Solibri

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    602 Views
    JSNJ

    See here
    https://society.solibri.com/topic/814/visualization-flickers-when-model-is-georeferenced
    but also here
    https://society.solibri.com/topic/2252/wish-for-ifc4-georeferencing

  • How can I start in viewer mode when I have an Office license?

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    Peter VlugP

    @Mats_Knutsson
    Never tried to do it in the shortcut, I think you can only arrange layouts in the role settings.

  • 0 Votes
    3 Posts
    641 Views
    IngarsI

    @fwassmann Then it must be bugging cuz of an old SMC file… ;/, thanks

  • Geometrical connection between models

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    479 Views
    P

    @twosk Can you show the full parameterization of the rule?

    You may need to limit the checks per system. Do the components in different models have some information that can be used to limit the checking to only those that actually need to connect? I assume that the “narrow brown pipes” should connect. You could have the filters to focus only on those pipes and have different rule instances for different systems. Also what do you have as the Minimum Number in the Target Component? I believe it should be two, since both ends of the pipes should connect.
    6c55fdf9-8200-4a5d-8686-1a8043687fc9-image.png

  • Why is there no "not accepted values" rule?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    508 Views
    S

    You could just add the list of values (enumerations) to a classification in the column that points to the locations you have specified i.e. psetx. This way the classification checks that the components that you are checking have the right value in that property. If it doesn’t exist or match the criterial set then it will be undefined.

    image.png

    The Unclassified tab shows the items that are not classified and their values for that field.
    image.png

    The Classified tab shows the sucessfull classifcations i.e. the component with a matching value.
    image.png

    You can then follow this up with a rule #230 Property Template with Component filters that checks the classification.

    image.png
    In this case checking the components that are defined in the COBie Assets filter and then the classification to check for Uniclass values.

    image.png

    This method has the benefit of being able to import your required values to the classification and also extend its criteria if required using additional columns in the classification.

    You could add another row into the requirements for the rule #230 that checked the particular field or keep this a separate rule. This would then also indicate components that did not have the value i.e. no psetx along with the ones that are not classified.

    This is how we work with the Uniclass values in the COBie Extension.

Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB