General Discussion

If you have filtered the results you might end up in a situation like in the picture. Please make sure you don’t have any of the results filtered out in the results window:

04b2b97a-047e-4dc0-b84a-7c915750f9d3-image.png

If you have this option set to “no filtering” and you still get this issue, update to the latest version and see if the problem still occurs. If so, please send a bug report to our [email protected]

thank you!

please do so!
but first completely support IfcMaterialLayer and a easy understandable user interface for them / or give the users some nice help tutorial videos

thanks

Hi, If the model is created in Revit initially then you can make sure that the parameters that control the object are exported. These parameters are contained in the dimensions properties. These can be exported by checking the Export Revit property sets or by mapping these parameters only using a mapping table associated to the export. These parameters can then be used in your rules.

@Bimiser

The customization can be done at least by using Manual Checking Rule #232.

Go to Ruleset Manager

Drag a new Manual Checking Rule #232 under your rule you want to customize
e248a256-e1f2-4e71-87bf-39c8f1652cf0-image.png

Set your rules “Sub Rule Options” to check only failed components
6297c6f3-4d5e-418a-856a-6f0b0a5bd4de-image.png

Customize the categories, issue names and descriptions for specific components (filters)
f1ecfa4c-532a-4094-9dd4-59db92afed03-image.png

But, thanks a lot for idea

@b-huijskes Thanks for your reply.
@Solibrians is this a function we can expect in upcoming Solibri releases in the near future? And, maybe a little off topic, but being new to the Solibri Society, I was wondering if there is a roadmap of the developments and features Solibri is working on that can be shared here?

Ok, thank you. I think this would be a Nice feature to have in the future.

Regards

Leif

Hi Solibri,

For your development I suggest:

*looking at how the UI of Solibri could improve to leverage the strenghts (existing and new) of the program.
*adding data cleaning possibilities like SimpleBIM.

Cheers,
Mats

@cpreidel Thanks for the update. It appears to be working better now.

Regards,
Karl

@JeroenKoomen - As far as I know the SMV registration is deprecated and replaced by the new Solibri ANywhere registration (https://www.solibri.com/download-Solibri-anywhere)

@Solibrians , I’d like to add to this message.

I’ve been contacten by users who have a SSC-account and want to start the Solibri Model Viewer by opening the Solibri Model Checker as the license is unavailable. (This is a workflow we’ve recommending for a while as the Solibri Model Viewer registration was not working)

Instead of starting the SMV, the user is redirected to a registering page for the SMV. However, registering for the SMV is not possible anymore and should also not be needed as they have a SSC-account.

Could you give more information on how/whether the SMV can still be used and in which scenario the customer needs to install the new Solibri Anywhere?

@dbaldacchino Thanks for letting us know that it works!

I noticed that in the Assignment tab, the columns are not arranged correctly. If you scroll to the right you will see 9.10 column between 9.5 and 9.1

I will fill a bug about it.

Thanks!

–
Jose

Our offering: https://www.solibri.com/our-offering

Society.jpg

The optimization of gatekeeper rule evaluation is included in the Solibri Model Checker 9.9.4.98. It is available now.