Tech Talks

@CIN Have you checked this video to get a quick overview on how it works?
https://youtu.be/iCH_Qr-WOy4

Nice. 🙂

Hi Cornelius,

It would not solve my issue. But I understand your solution.

For me a solution would be if there is an option to allow / disallow a user taking multiple licenses.

Jeroen

We, KUBUS, heard back from Solibri support that this issue is fixed for Windos with the new release (9.10.1.137), this customer confirmed the fix.
For MacOS, a fix has not yet been released.

I understand.

Now it is a little bit confusing so either solution is fine with me (remove the user line or show the user box as checked).

Thx for your quick reply @cpreidel

Hey @Ricardo,

forwarded your request to support and put you in the CC.

Cheers
Cornelius

Hey @Joel ,

why not using the #222 Component Distance Rule? With the help of classifications, you should be able to classify the affected surfaces accordingly and then measure if there is anything above this surface in a respective (e.g. this average height of a person) maximal distance. Otherwise, you could also directly measure the space component (e.g. installation room) itself for its dimension with Rule Template #230…

Would that help?

KR
Cornelius

Hey @Lauri-Luoma

Great news, perfect!
Nothing you guys can’t fix, right? 👷

Have a great day and until next time, hopefully soon! 👋
Nico

Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your answer.
I already thought it was not possible with a ITO, but maybe there was something I overlooked.
I’m going to try your solution with ruleSOL/23/5.1.

Greeting,

Harmen

Hi Hannes,

Thanks for the reply. I tried it and it helps me a bit, so I’m satisfied haha.

@Torbjorn-K said in Rename standards Pset:

In Sweden we have solved it so in ARCHICAD its set in the template. Then there have been creted txt files for the other programs so everyone deliver according to predefined names and PSET. So my suggestion is if you don’t have a standard you have to create the export files and inform the users how to export with that.

Thanks for your advice.
We know about mapping.
In our city, there are a huge number of big or small companies that have different software.
There are Autodesk, Trimble (Tekla), Graphisoft, MagiCAD Group, Intergraph, Bentley, Nemetschek and so on. All of them have to teach their customers but not we are.
We just asked about such a possibility. A new small tool would be useful for us, but we’ll manage.
Thanks everyone.

@Konstantin said in Rule #SOL/179/4.3 Egress convergence:

eans of egress from the point of converge

Rule #179 doesn’t have check for sum of occupants in the two floors.
The only way to check this is to check two floor having the maximum occupants separately.
Filter two floors in the parameters or by using the “check selected” filter (a new feature in Solibri Model Checker 9.9.4.98).

Hello Jeroen,

May I ask from which version of Solibri Model Viewer you are launching the “Get free license key” registration?

We have been experiencing issues with license key creation for Solibri Model Viewer and I would ask you to contact [email protected] related to this issue so that we are able to follow-up on how many might be affected by this issue.

Br,
Sebastian

Hello Marcus and thank you for your input.

We are currently looking into our products portfolio to see what functionality we want to provide in each product moving forward. Creation of issues in SMV has been brought up before from other users. We see that this might be a good addition in the future to facilitate issue management between products.

Br,
Sebastian on behalf of Solibri Team

Hey Niels,

Thanks for your post! Let me try to answer your questions:

The matter with the IDs is admittedly a bit confusing, but traditionally the different authoring tools follow slightly different ways how to keep the components in a model identifiable. In principle, however, they all have a unique identifier system which helps to identify a component uniquely. These identifiers can be converted into each other and vice versa. E.g. Revit has the ElementId, which merely is converted into an IfcGuid when exported. As far as I know, there are also some plugins which can show you the IfcGuid in the Revit environment. So long story short, both values represent the same reference. If it didn’t do so, it wouldn’t be a unique identifier. For the BCF standard, the IfcGuid is decisive, which can also be seen here https://github.com/BuildingSMART/BCF-XML/tree/master/Documentation

Here are some blog entries by Jeremy Tammik on how to convert the Revit ElementId into the IfcGuid and back again.
http://thebuildingcoder.typepad.com/blog/2009/02/uniqueid-dwf-and-ifc-guid.html
http://thebuildingcoder.typepad.com/blog/2010/06/ifc-guid-algorithm-in-c.html

Solibri uses the IfcGuid for the identification. The reported entities option offers only the possibility to show other information in the presentation mode - this does not influence the identification system at all. Of course, the BATID should not change - and this is the same for the IfcGuid since it is derived from the BATID. If the uniformity of BATID and IfcGuid would change, then there is a massive error in the export routine!

As already outlined, the reported identities define which kind of information is shown in the error report, but it is not referring to the decisive reference within the BCF, so this will not change anything here. If a reference is lost, it means that the GUID of the element in the model was changed or broken, which might happen when remodeling, copying or doing a similar modification in between the versions. I would suggest, to compare the two versions of the IFC models with the Solibri Model Checker (Rule SOL/206) - with this you should get an overview of what has changed. Or search for the missing IfcGuid with a text editor. We could also have a look at this together in a web session. If you’re interested, please send a PM.

Kind regards
Cornelius