Tech Talks

Hi @Matti-Kannala! Thanks for your answer and quick feedback!

I have tested it today and now it is working.

@KarlF Would it be possible to get the model that causes your Solibri to slow down? Please have a look at this thread: https://society.solibri.com/topic/328/solibri-is-looking-for-models

Hi Jeroen,

Good news for you: In the latest version of Solibri (9.10) this is now the case.

With kind regards,
Hilde
KUBUS BV

@Robbert-Evers

Solibri has a rule template for checking differences between model revisions. The rule template ID number is #206.

I checked the attached models and the rule found differences in the placement and quantities.

If you have already tried the rule template, could you add more details to question?

@Ronald-van-Emst

It is a bug and it is now added to our bug database.

Instead of using Pivot Point in the rotate around the point the Move coordinates are used.
Using the both Move and Rotating produces now false results.
Using only Move or Rotation works as expected.

@CIN Have you checked this video to get a quick overview on how it works?
https://youtu.be/iCH_Qr-WOy4

Nice. 🙂

Hi Cornelius,

It would not solve my issue. But I understand your solution.

For me a solution would be if there is an option to allow / disallow a user taking multiple licenses.

Jeroen

We, KUBUS, heard back from Solibri support that this issue is fixed for Windos with the new release (9.10.1.137), this customer confirmed the fix.
For MacOS, a fix has not yet been released.

I understand.

Now it is a little bit confusing so either solution is fine with me (remove the user line or show the user box as checked).

Thx for your quick reply @cpreidel

Hey @Ricardo,

forwarded your request to support and put you in the CC.

Cheers
Cornelius

Hey @Joel ,

why not using the #222 Component Distance Rule? With the help of classifications, you should be able to classify the affected surfaces accordingly and then measure if there is anything above this surface in a respective (e.g. this average height of a person) maximal distance. Otherwise, you could also directly measure the space component (e.g. installation room) itself for its dimension with Rule Template #230…

Would that help?

KR
Cornelius

Hey @Lauri-Luoma

Great news, perfect!
Nothing you guys can’t fix, right? 👷

Have a great day and until next time, hopefully soon! 👋
Nico

Hello Daniel,

Thank you for your answer.
I already thought it was not possible with a ITO, but maybe there was something I overlooked.
I’m going to try your solution with ruleSOL/23/5.1.

Greeting,

Harmen

Hi Hannes,

Thanks for the reply. I tried it and it helps me a bit, so I’m satisfied haha.

@Torbjorn-K said in Rename standards Pset:

In Sweden we have solved it so in ARCHICAD its set in the template. Then there have been creted txt files for the other programs so everyone deliver according to predefined names and PSET. So my suggestion is if you don’t have a standard you have to create the export files and inform the users how to export with that.

Thanks for your advice.
We know about mapping.
In our city, there are a huge number of big or small companies that have different software.
There are Autodesk, Trimble (Tekla), Graphisoft, MagiCAD Group, Intergraph, Bentley, Nemetschek and so on. All of them have to teach their customers but not we are.
We just asked about such a possibility. A new small tool would be useful for us, but we’ll manage.
Thanks everyone.