General Discussion

Thanks Toni for your help!

@AndreH said in Checking for corrupt geometrie:

Is there a rule to check this?

There is no such rule.
You need develop a custom rule:

https://solibri.github.io/Developer-Platform/latest/javadoc/index.html

@BvanDalsum We have already done that, but thanks for the tip.
For some reason, Windows or Solibri does not recognize the Nvidia GPU as standard. With new laptops I have to configure it manually like the way you described…

Thank you so much for your reply

just saw it now:) “…Solibri internal unit of length is millimeters, regardless of user defined settings. Any calculations made use length as millimeters, and this is important to consider while creating formulas and setting formats. …”

Can confirm that this issue still happens. Also inconsistencies between classification showing classified and ITO made with same classification as column showing unclassified…

Might be or may be not.

I don’t know another way to do it, efficiently and without problems on your models, even large ones.
You can try it with ifcopenshell, might work, but not sure it’s stable enough to use it.
If you got other stuff, i’ll try them out to see the differences, especially on large files.

For mine, i’ve tested it out on large files, mep, mechanical, architectural, and i got no loss of geometry or data.

It’s agnostic to versions.

And i’ve developped other things aroung :

extract / delete things, types, or levels slice by level Compare version 1 and version 2 to retrieve the IFC model of differences only (with colour coding) -> new, modified, deleted

Thanks for reminding. This is a simple thing to fix.

@mikan said in How to move PDF drawing:

Are you using Revit 2025? Try printing by using some other PDF driver, for me that did the trick. I have to test with Revit 2026 (for now I am blaiming Revit 2025, but the problem might be somewhere else)

Using Revit 2024 in this case. But got the same results with Revit 2025 using the inbuild PDF exporter. When using Print to PDF or a plugin the PDF does work fine with Solibri.

@Solibrians Any ideas how to fix this?

@tonigyllenberg
To add all components to all viewpoints would be preferable in my opinion!
I’m really looking forward to getting this feature sorted 🙂

you’re welcome

Has anyone already found a solution to access the Profile Name property? I would love to use this parameter in a checking rule?

@Solibrians Could you point me towards the current tutorial? Sorry for commenting on a quite old post.

Hello!

For JavaScript API the latest documentation is here:

https://society.solibri.com/topic/3368/solibri-api-solibri-javascript-api

Kind regards,

Toni

Hi @simon-gilbert , thanks for this explanation and link, it’s really helpful.

@Anil thanks for getting back to me, email has been sent.

Hi @JMann , please delete .solibri folders (note the dot) from the path C:\Users<username> and re-launch Solibri. If the issue still persists, please send the log folder to [email protected] after zipping it. The log folder can be found on the installation folder i.e C:\Program Files\Solibri\SOLIBRI.

@JSN Nice to see a slightly more positive verse this time around!

Most of the devs are out on Christmas break, but we’ll dig into this again when they come back. I recall that we’ve discussed this topic a few times already, and that there are some underlying technical limitations here and there. Either way I’ll check with the gurus and see what the options are.

Kind regards,

Toni

Great tip. My colleagues and I were thinking that I could take off xyz coordinates for frozen elements and plug the list to the parameters checking rule. That kind of works well if only several aspects are frozen.
The problem I see with compare tool is that quite a lot of manual works is involved. It would be great if it could be just another enabled rule without loading side models 🙂