General Discussion

Here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UimI7F4VAcNTQd274zSoi9jf9JO1Ovg6/view?usp=sharing

Its latest solibri, rtx 4060 is updated.
section settings needs to be only opened and any setting triggered. After this settings can be cancelled, but the display would should section correctly.

Welcome back to the year 1980…
i think there a far more important things that can be changed than a copy of PDF files
a solution could be don’t accept a pdf with multiple sections

Is their any updates for the Clash detection matrix rule ?

@twosk kohdistuskappale.jpg. All designers model the alignment part in their own model.

This is most often a corrupted file. That is probably the reason why the backup files are a day older.

Has anybody still tried this?

Hi @tonigyllenberg,
I didn’t use the IDS yet, but will look at it - thanks for pointing me to this direction.
Matt

@lraimo said in Not able to load IFC model with same name but different timestamps as separate models in Solibri 9.13.15:

@Solibrians
Any update on this matter?

This is currently not on the list for development, but we will assess this internally.

If files are exported from revit with real coordinates with PBP set at the project zero, i get these values.

It would be great to know from where the information is taken or even a hint what setup is prefered.

feedc73d-51bc-430b-ae06-99ac7d7c7aa8-image.png

UI is different now, but the UX is still irritating …

Collapsed
image.png

Expanded
image.png

yes, please, that would be very useful

Thanks - I have replied.

@Alex-J Now I had finally time to return to this rule. Turns out the problem was that I had the MEP as the component 2 (the wrong side). I had never thought that the positioning of the checked components is significant.
Thanks a lot, now I (once again) feel like I can do anything!

Hi @matti I’m familiar with that folder — I just thought there might be a separate log file for the integrations where I could find more detailed information about the data received from the Microsoft Graph API.

In the meantime, we’ve archived some of our older SharePoint sites, which seems to have significantly improved performance. Where we previously had to wait 1 to 1.5 minutes, it now only takes a few seconds.

We do have one request: it would be great if we could mark certain sites as favorites, so Solibri wouldn’t need to load the entire SharePoint site list every time. Instead, the favorite sites could be stored directly in Solibri. Our SharePoint list contains around 200 items, but each user only needs a handful of them.

Edit: Perhaps it would be a good idea to use GET https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/me/followedSites instead of https://graph.microsoft.com/v1.0/sites?search=*. This way, the list that’s fetched would be much shorter.

I’m trying to understand the impact of an “INF” (infinity) value on our models, specifically whether it affects the geometrical or alphanumerical aspects. While I haven’t noticed any immediate issues when viewing these models in other viewers, I suspect a deeper investigation might be needed.

Understanding the precise impact of this “INF” value will help us determine if a new pop-up window is necessary to address it within our system.

Hello @francescacataldo!

Just a hunch, but is your model very far from the origin?