General Discussion

@HechtwieFisch One thing you can do is that you create a specific rule for these doors, if you can filter them out separately, and then parameterize the rule according to the dimensions that you measure from the door. This works, if there are a few different kinds of instances of this door.

@Matti-Kannala Yes that worked, thank you!

I had to disable the other GPU though. I tried to force the iGPU through the Graphics Settings in Windows 10, but Solibri always uses the AMD Card if it’s not disabled. Do you by any chance know, which .exe I have to create the Graphics Settings rule for, so Solibri uses the internal GPU? I tried Solibri.exe, java.exe and javaw.exe.

Thanks. Are there any tips and hints on the best way to monitor the resolution of clashes?

Is it better to add presentations to the same smc, or create one presentation that updates each review, and summarises outstanding issues?

Thanks for the answer and sugestion Harmen, i will try that next time.
I got it working as i wanted with the SOL/230 rule and a classification to support the rule.

@agroni M2

Hi @Matti-Kannala , about Trimble Connect as BCf server for Solibri, it is possible to have the Serve ID or Index value? Is this an option related to Solibri or Trimble development? Thanks!

trimble connect.jpg

Thanks for reminding on this.
One workaround for this bug would be using system classification and filter based on classifcation.

@Wing-Mang completely agree with you.
Some reports from issues management platforms in their free version do not make all the formats available or, even with the paid version, the report (for example in Excel) is not as detailed as that of Solibri.
Adding the reporting option in the BCF Live Connector would be a very useful and appreciated feature.
@Matti-Kannala Are there any plans for this feature? Thanks

Issue is solved. The issue was there were too many folders opened in the Ruleset Folders view.
Thanks to @bart-bol

Thanks for this report. In the next release the model tree supports nesting and supports IFC4X3.

Hi,
IT;s probably an Assembly.
Try klicking it with CTRL at the same time

Just an update on my workflow.
I first update and save my Selection Set. But when I select my updated Selection Set. I see objects that are NOT in my Selection Set. And are not a part of the current Selection Basket. That is incorrect behavior.
So in the Selection Basket Window I select all objects that áre in the Selection Basket. I conform again with =. Objects in the 3D view disapear. And I save my Selection Set again. From this moment on the Selection Set works again as expected.
This does not make sense and feels like a bug.

@Matti-Kannala said in Rule 203 strange behaviour:

Note: We found out that the option is not fixing rule 203 parametrization automatically. This will be in the next release.

I would suggest you to add screenshots, sample files or both.

Hi @lasse-lindqvist, regarding ProjectWise, are there any future plans to add ProjectWise among the integrations available in the vanilla version of Solibri? Thanks

Nevermind, found others with the same issue. Cannot delete the original post, sorry.