General Discussion

In other software we used to clash detect ceilings and floors against walls. This would visually show where floors had been modelled incorrectly. You could try a similar rule in Solibri based on template 245 but try floors clashing with more than one space/room.

Old topic here but when doing a value for must not exist.
Checked Components:

State: Include
Component: Wall
Property: Pset_WallSpecific.TypeOfBrick
Operator: Is Defined

Property Sets:
Component: Wall
Property Set: Pset_WallSpecific
Property: TypeOfBrick
Value Exists: Must not Exist
Value Conditions: X=Dummy

It says all values can’t exist instead of only the values that have IfcText “Dummy”.

Hi @HieuVH I’ve sent you a new link. Please try it and reply to the email if any issues occur.
Thanks.

@Matti-Kannala said in DALUX BCF Live view makes 3D View glitch:

“C:\Program Files\Solibri\SOLIBRI\log\runtime.log”.

HI Matti, no they were originally created in Revit (2022). I will send this to Solibri Support, thank you!

Hi,

We are experiencing the same. I think this is due to the fact that dimensions are automatically added to the view, which of course takes quite some processing with a few hundred intersections.

Could the automatically added dimension made optional?

I’ve noticed the same behaviour with missing components, however the missing components do appear in our ITO’s but don’t show up in our 3D view.

I mostly split it in email at the top and teams at the bottom. But also usefull for coding, reviewing pdf, excel with lost of rows, and Navisworks Clash detection.

Hello @matt-knowles , please close Solibri and delete the .solibri folder from the path below and retry.
C:\Users<username>.solibri
If the issue persists, send your log files to [email protected] for further assistance.
logs; C:\Program Files\Solibri\SOLIBRI\log
Thank you.

@Maria-Martinez This should be possible with a JavaScript column - depending on what you want to achieve.

@agroni said in Rule for coordinating "Requirements" between models:

I am not sure though, if I correctly understand you about the mirrored filters. I would appreciate a small explanation

Some rules have two filters. Sometimes you need to check things vice versa with two rule instances where these two filters are swapped (mirrored). Often useful with Rule 234.

Hi Julian
I have notified a similar issue (report takes too long to produce for some rules and models, in some cases nothing is produced) and my current workaround is to produce the report in v 9.13.8 (until now I was always able to open the file even if it was saved with v 24.5.0).

@agroni

I remember discussions about those things here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1870/multiple-psets-in-solibri?_=1723053434811

here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1315/pset-title-and-parameters-value-in-italic-written/3?_=1723053434815

and here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/683/italic-font-for-solibri-properties-values/2?_=1619695830473
( I guess it’s the same reason for Psets and Properties)

… but it’s good to have raised awareness once again!

Great, that worked.

Hi @Pegah,
I noticed the same issue too. Here is the link to the March post: https://society.solibri.com/post/11242. Unfortunately, the bug continues to be present in version 24.5 even though it should have been fixed “in the next release”.

@JSN We upgraded earlier this week and this might be related.
I’ll see what I can do to make the dark theme better.
In the meantime, I’d suggest to use the light one, sorry for the inconvenience.
Custom themes were dropped for dark/light mode compatibility reasons.

Perfect 😵

@twosk

based on your initial sketch I would have said #234 is getting you close but taking your additional information into consideration your use case might be more complex.