General Discussion

@Paul-Linder

It still happens and this brough me back to this post.

ba4d552a-9f6a-4f4d-830c-d9c7157c618c-image.png

Btw, regarding an appointment - seems like we missed each other in Munich this week, but sure I can send you a short mail. If there is actual interest in feedback and making improvements.

As I understood the question I don’t think you actually need a gatekeeper rule.
I think you could use the general intersection rule and check any component with the property set “pset BIP” and the property “StatusConstruction” that is one of “New”.

6a8189e8-ec81-4125-812d-8a9267cdd79a-grafik.png

A gatekeeper should be possible too but I think this would be unnecessary in this case.

so far as I have tested, it seems to me that both are the case.
I tested this method also with a file that was clearly missing some Mb. Solibri (after closing/opening) could not open this file. For another file, that seemed plausible in size, this method worked.

Thank you Matti, it worked.

Severity calculations are specific to the individual rules. This article explains severities, how to override them, and has a link to a PDF of a table that details how the severities are calculated.

https://www.solibri.com/articles/understanding-the-severity-levels-of-checking-results

It is from 2015, so some of the more recently created rules will be missing. Please let me know if there is a specific rule you are interested in.

I think that would be nice, for ITOs especially.

Could share a picture showing which identification fields you want have in the report.

Hi @stebehan,

I remember that there were some bugs involved with interposing a folder between a second gatekeeper (that already comes after a first one) and the “last node” rule, maybe you can try without the “LOI” folders.

Basically, Gatekeeper > Gatekeeper > Folder > Rule is buggy and should be avoided.

Here are some setups that do work (using Windows):

Gatekeeper > Multiple Folder > Multiple rules
image.png

Gatekeeper > Multiple Gatekeepers > Rule
5b9b07e7-286d-4cc2-9bd4-1b26d2c84c7a-image.png

Gatekeeper > Multiple Folders > Gatekeeper > Gatekeeper > Multiple rules
1cb9e183-8634-4ee3-abae-2a230a24491f-image.png

@Matti Hei, what’s the email for support? should i contact nordicbim if i’m located in norway? 🙂

@JSN and @Patrick loading and unloading models was one of Solibri X’s features. Unfortunately they pulled the plug and some of Solibri X great features aren’t seen since. @JSN that’s quite a list of long awaited features.

Did you try to switch to max distance? try to set Max distance to 5mm

@Pasi-Paasiala @Paul-Linder

I sent you a file wit we transfer. I experiance this that the component filter not work.
I exclude the _hulp object, but the result of the matrix shows a clash?

image.png

image.png

@Matti-Kannala , thnx.
it was back face culling indeed.
Normaly i leave the box unchecked but this time it wasn’t.

Fortunately, it was something simple I overlooked

Hi, Could you log a case with [email protected] and please include your SMC file and the Excel template so that we can investigate the issue for you.

Thanks, I didn’t have the time to follow the release notes, so I missed that info.

Naming the version of a subscribed software by years does make sense.

Thanks @Harmen-Jorritsma for the response.

This was indeed the issue, i had a lot of rules loaded into the model and one of them was partially disabled.

The little details will get you!

thanks again.

3 Years later is there a solution for this?
Currently, I am using Rules 223, 234 and 1 to minmize the errors, which takes a lot of time and effort.
I wish there would be just one precise rule