General Discussion

Seems strange but hard to say without more context

Hi @Matti can you provide some more info as mentioned in your answer above?

@Paul-Linder

It still happens and this brough me back to this post.

ba4d552a-9f6a-4f4d-830c-d9c7157c618c-image.png

Btw, regarding an appointment - seems like we missed each other in Munich this week, but sure I can send you a short mail. If there is actual interest in feedback and making improvements.

As I understood the question I don’t think you actually need a gatekeeper rule.
I think you could use the general intersection rule and check any component with the property set “pset BIP” and the property “StatusConstruction” that is one of “New”.

6a8189e8-ec81-4125-812d-8a9267cdd79a-grafik.png

A gatekeeper should be possible too but I think this would be unnecessary in this case.

so far as I have tested, it seems to me that both are the case.
I tested this method also with a file that was clearly missing some Mb. Solibri (after closing/opening) could not open this file. For another file, that seemed plausible in size, this method worked.

Thank you Matti, it worked.

@Matti

When you change the vmoptions, how mutch slower is Solibri with showing the clashes?
Have you test this?
Or is it a matter of 1 or 2 seconds slower to show the clash?

Severity calculations are specific to the individual rules. This article explains severities, how to override them, and has a link to a PDF of a table that details how the severities are calculated.

https://www.solibri.com/articles/understanding-the-severity-levels-of-checking-results

It is from 2015, so some of the more recently created rules will be missing. Please let me know if there is a specific rule you are interested in.

I just came here again to emphasize once more that the current implementation falls short of meeting user needs or being user-friendly.

I think that would be nice, for ITOs especially.

Could share a picture showing which identification fields you want have in the report.

Hi @stebehan,

I remember that there were some bugs involved with interposing a folder between a second gatekeeper (that already comes after a first one) and the “last node” rule, maybe you can try without the “LOI” folders.

Basically, Gatekeeper > Gatekeeper > Folder > Rule is buggy and should be avoided.

Here are some setups that do work (using Windows):

Gatekeeper > Multiple Folder > Multiple rules
image.png

Gatekeeper > Multiple Gatekeepers > Rule
5b9b07e7-286d-4cc2-9bd4-1b26d2c84c7a-image.png

Gatekeeper > Multiple Folders > Gatekeeper > Gatekeeper > Multiple rules
1cb9e183-8634-4ee3-abae-2a230a24491f-image.png

@Matti Hei, what’s the email for support? should i contact nordicbim if i’m located in norway? 🙂

@JSN and @Patrick loading and unloading models was one of Solibri X’s features. Unfortunately they pulled the plug and some of Solibri X great features aren’t seen since. @JSN that’s quite a list of long awaited features.

Did you try to switch to max distance? try to set Max distance to 5mm

@Pasi-Paasiala @Paul-Linder

I sent you a file wit we transfer. I experiance this that the component filter not work.
I exclude the _hulp object, but the result of the matrix shows a clash?

image.png

image.png