General Discussion

@agroni said in Rule for coordinating "Requirements" between models:

I am not sure though, if I correctly understand you about the mirrored filters. I would appreciate a small explanation

Some rules have two filters. Sometimes you need to check things vice versa with two rule instances where these two filters are swapped (mirrored). Often useful with Rule 234.

Hi Julian
I have notified a similar issue (report takes too long to produce for some rules and models, in some cases nothing is produced) and my current workaround is to produce the report in v 9.13.8 (until now I was always able to open the file even if it was saved with v 24.5.0).

@agroni

I remember discussions about those things here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1870/multiple-psets-in-solibri?_=1723053434811

here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1315/pset-title-and-parameters-value-in-italic-written/3?_=1723053434815

and here …
https://society.solibri.com/topic/683/italic-font-for-solibri-properties-values/2?_=1619695830473
( I guess it’s the same reason for Psets and Properties)

… but it’s good to have raised awareness once again!

Great, that worked.

Hi @Pegah,
I noticed the same issue too. Here is the link to the March post: https://society.solibri.com/post/11242. Unfortunately, the bug continues to be present in version 24.5 even though it should have been fixed “in the next release”.

@JSN We upgraded earlier this week and this might be related.
I’ll see what I can do to make the dark theme better.
In the meantime, I’d suggest to use the light one, sorry for the inconvenience.
Custom themes were dropped for dark/light mode compatibility reasons.

Perfect 😵

@twosk

based on your initial sketch I would have said #234 is getting you close but taking your additional information into consideration your use case might be more complex.

Thanks Simon.

@Pasi-Paasiala Thank you very much! I use the 24.5.0.31 Solibri Version.
Yes I have unticked that but the condition remains the same:
1.jpg

Thank you @Pasi-Paasiala and @Paul-Linder for adding the issue!
Bye,
Viola

@Solibrians Is there any way to do this besides exporting them one at a time?

@JeroenKoomen yes it should be ok: we got in contact with Autodesk and the change of endpoints is indeed happening. They added us to the list of customers that get extra time until the 31st of July. The reason why we don’t need to make a hotfix release is that contrary to the earlier information we had, the required changes can only be done in the backend, which doesn’t require a new release. We have already implemented the changes in the backend but it may take some time until they become effective i.e. when V2 endpoints are in use. There should anyway be much enough time for that to happen before the end of month. So everything should be fine but we’ll follow up the situation in case problems would arise.

Today i had the same kind of problem with missing elements, if i open the IFC as a stand alone the element are present. if i update the ifc in the SMC they are still missing.
removing the ifc totaly from the SMC and ADD the model then the missing elements appear.

this totaly makes updating models not reliable and is an absolute a no go for using Solibri

tried solibri 9.13 and 24.5 with the same result.

where can I make a request for this?

This should be resolved in the latest build of the Fire Stopping rules, the issue is related to components distance from the origin. We now transform the Door to the origin create the studs and re-position to carry out the clash.

@Matti-Kannala So as I understand, the Location will auto regenerated for comp that has spaces in relation and it will not appear if the comp doesn’t have any spaces in relation.