General Discussion

@chris For me the geolocation of the models imposes in Revit and in Archicad that the models are close to the points of origin of Softwares, but that it is the coordinates (Data) of the Reference Point of Localization in Archicad and the Base Point in Revit which are informed…
Tell me if I am wrong.

@agroni you said : "Sorry to say, but the only thing that is correct in these coordinates is the “Z”.
Reluctantly I I tried to leave the buildings close to the X,Y = 0 coordinates and keep the elevation relative to sea level in Archicad and Revit, but even doing this the Solibri navigation map does not adapt itself to the Z of the project:

Example 1: if I put myself at N02 in the map, the 3D view shows me the basement!
Vue Map.png

Example 2: If I approach of N02 in the 3D view, the navigation map shows me the roof level rather than N02. Is this normal ?
Vue 3D.png

Question:
Wouldn’t it be possible to manage in the Solibri parameters the insertion point of the IFCs files at (choice) :

coordinates 0,0,0, of Solibri, or

real coordinates of IFC

@ville-reima said in No Navigation Map:

gation map seems to have disappeared in some SMC mode

Is this happening with all your models?
Which Solibri version you are using?

You could try to remove following node in Windows Registry Editor:

Computer\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\Prefs\com\solibri\saf\plugins\java3dplugin\ui

It stores the size of the map.

@hlg thanks, did this before, but turns out the rules didn’t update in Solibri 🙂 it was the problem indeed 🙂

After investigating this case, I will report that as an issue to debug.

Thanks for helping me out 👍

Hello @JMann,

Unfortunately we don’t have any updates on the topic yet. At the moment we are currently not working on checking improvements, and this item has not been selected for development.

Kind regards,
Toni on behalf of the Solibri team

@dirkbent said in Logitech M705 mouse problems:

@ricardo i use a program called logitech options

Will try that. Thanks!

@matti-kannala Out of interest what effect does adding this option have?

@Nuno Thank you.

Hi @sfbeaz !

That Wordpress site was taken down, because a lot of its contents was outdated. The content from the site should be found via our Online Help Center to a great extent, so I would recommend starting from there. 🙂

There were a few more specific topics that were covered in the Wordpress site that have not been transferred to our Help Center. If there is such a topic you are interested in that you can’t find from the Help Center, please let us know, and we can see what we can do with the help of our archives. With the disclaimer, though, that the material might in any case be outdated. 🙂

Hope this helps!

Best regards,
Riina on behalf of Solibri Team

@pasi-paasiala Thanks for sharing! I couldn’t click on this fast enough! 🙂

@Matti-Kannala: thanks for the feedback. Unfortunately not quite the solution I expected … Is there no other way to fix it?
@Ricardo: yep. clearly a bug…

shortcut or button ‘delete all sectionplanes’

Only filter the unhandeld/undefined issues in the checking results.
In this example i only want to see the 696 open issues between Wall and Window.
cfa37596-6168-47b5-b2b5-8d311bafce4c-image.png

Hello everyone,

On Wednesday we have released the Beta version of our new release (9.12.6).
This version includes the fixes and improvements to the BCF-API communication.
We’ve included a new indication of issue sending fails - a new icon is displayed in the issues table and the issues won’t duplicate anymore.

Depending then on the synchronization mode, sending the issue will be tried again, if you are using Automatic Synchronization. If you are not using Automatic Synchronization, then the issue will be sent again, when you press the “Mark As Ready” button.

Another thing that was fixed was the duplicated color specification for the same component. This might occur, if the Solibri model has the same IFC model imported twice, e.g. different versions of it, and components of both models appear colored in a viewpoint. This might happen also, if two components have the same IFC GUID in one IFC file. Now only one color definition is sent.

These improvements will help in similar problems with other servers as well.

If you would like to join the Beta program and test these fixes, you can do so by following the instructions on this link.

After the beta phase, these fixes will be included in the public release which should be available around the 18th of May.

Thank you,
David and the Solibri team.

Hello all!

Regarding these issues, a fix is now available for testing with our 9.12.6 beta version. Please test and let us know how the solution works 🙂

Not yet a beta tester? See these instructions on how to join.

Kind regards,
Toni in behalf of the Solibri team

Hello HechtwieFisch, thanks for your Reply.

I tried again, with the same BCF file, and it worked. I don’t know what the problem was. Probably it got solved because I restarted Revit. who knows, but thanks.

@johnd said in Comprehensive hard clashes designed to pushed to power bi.:

have a general Solibri question, ive touched on it previously …

Replying to this rather old topic as I wanted to ask you how you used the mentioned mouse recorder for creating the rules as I imagine that adding new rules for different entities is difficult to achieve with this automatization task. Anyhow could you elaborate this a bit more?

Ok, it’s happening again … not good.