Skip to content

General Discussion

Let's talk Solibri!

1.1k Topics 5.1k Posts
  • Synchronizing models with external platform

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    445 Views
    JSNJ

    I throw in another example with the new Graphisoft BIM Cloud as previously already suggested would it be great to save and load .smc directly there but also as @Daan wrote would the possibility of loading IFC files directly from a such a service provider might be a very good idea to streamline the workflow.

    https://society.solibri.com/topic/881/save-and-load-smc-directly-on-graphisoft-bimcloud?_=1602760737501

  • Solibri 4K

    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    1k Views
    dserdiukovD

    Today comes Solibri new version with “Application level scaling for high resolution screens”. Who knows how its works?

  • I got the same Issue

    6
    0 Votes
    6 Posts
    910 Views
    MattiM

    No need to delete.

  • Not able to show Components within an Assembly in ITO

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    892 Views
    JeroenKoomenJ

    I think you are using the exclude in the wrong way.
    Try to exclude like this and all the assemblies will be gone.

    750d1fe0-8f95-472a-97d0-c91af7b14a36-image.png

    Do not use the decompose as a column in your ITO.

    Another suggestion is using classifications to exclude assemblies and to make a first logical demarcation between elements. And then making different ITO’s using this demarcation.

  • Solibri is looking for Models!

    13
    0 Votes
    13 Posts
    3k Views
    JoelJ

    Hey!

    Yes, I’ve got a big .smc with big ifc:s included.
    Still interested?

    /Best regards
    Joel

  • Log In Screen /

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    L

    How logging in works:

    User inputs username and password Solibri sends these to the server Server responds with an access token Solibri takes the access token, uses it to actually start and such. If “remember me” was chosen, access token is kept on disk

    So, Solibri never remembers the username and password, and we don’t really want to remember those.
    Now, access token is kept on disk and is used on subsequent starts if it is still valid. It should stay valid for 30 days. After that Solibri notices that it is no longer valid and requires username and password to get a fresh token.

    Why 30 days? The length is totally arbitrary, but 30 days is quite common default in many web services. It could be a year. Maybe 30 days is such that still after 30 days you would remember the password without writing it down, after a year you might not. And 30 days is still long enough that you don’t need to input it too often.

    Why is it sometimes shorter than 30 days? The access token is kept on disk and if you remove your C:\Users\user.name\.solibri folder, it is gone. One other way to retrigger the password prompt is to tick of “remember me” in Solibri settings. There are other cases when services usually invalidate existing access tokens. One in particular is password change. You can try this in email or social media services, changing your password via desktop browser most likely logs you out in your mobile devices. So with Solibri too it might happen that sometimes the access token isn’t valid for the whole duration.

    As for the specific case where someone has had to input their password and username too early, it is difficult to say why without exact dates and times.

    Addition:
    Like browsers do it, by remembering credentials when access token has expired. I don’t think anything really prevents us from making Solibri remember the username and password and automatically putting them to the fields. But if we had that, we would need to have a way of clearing them easily, and as the browser used in the login screen is not a full browser, there is no way to go to settings and clear them.
    I think personally I would prefer keeping the access token refreshed continuously so the login screen wouldn’t ever popup if you didn’t log out intentionally.

  • 3 Votes
    3 Posts
    781 Views
    MombourM

    @Matti-Kannala Hey Matti, thanks for the reply - looking forward to the next release! Best M

  • Solibri becoming more powerhungry?

    7
    1 Votes
    7 Posts
    2k Views
    RicardoR

    A tip for everybody dealing with big models: check if your models contain components with a lot of round geometry. This can be checked with an ITO. (Triangle count).

    For what I know there is not a rule for what is considered a ‘high amount’, but when the number is above 14.000 I normally try to do something with it. I have examples where the file size has halved…

  • Rule 203 - how to generalise?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    617 Views
    S

    Hi,
    simply add the elements to be checked in the upper field,
    then add a line like this in the lower field (checked PSet here is “Text”):
    310409bb-0c33-42df-bf34-60dbeb1c754d-grafik.png


    Stefan

  • User defined object type in Solibri

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    309 Views
    JSNJ

    @chidam

    Hi, how did you create your IFC? I once had a similiar issue resulting in different values shown by Solibri and Zoom. I leave it here for your disposal so may gives you a hint what’s going on.

    https://society.solibri.com/topic/474/construction-type-type-name/2?_=1601282645636

  • Corridor width

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    552 Views
    M GroenewoudM

    Hi Shapeless,

    Try rule 238 ‘Accessible Route Rule’. From the Accessiblity Rules section in the rule Libriary.

    Greetings
    Martijn Groenewoud

  • CHANGE OF COLORS IN IFC FOR SHARING

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    1k Views
    D

    Estoy intentando descargar la prueba a ver si puedo ejecutar como me comenta pero se genero un error y no me deja volver

  • "Null (0)" value in Classification?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    825 Views
    L

    @cpreidel Thanx for your Reply.

    In Revit there is only a Type Parameter, which has a value “0”

  • Allowed Property Values - Concatenated values from multiple lists

    8
    0 Votes
    8 Posts
    2k Views
    Simo_ZS

    Thanks very much @Matti-Kannala!

  • New Rulesets added and the previous checking results changed. why?

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    431 Views
    P

    Hi Toni @tonigyllenberg

    Thanks for the reply.
    I was using the “Check Model” Feature and didn’t work out.
    I tried making new rulesets (with same properties) in new smc file and it was still the same.
    And then, I deleted the Property Value and added the same value again and it was ok.
    This one project is now good but I still don’t get the cause of the problem.

    Sincerely, Pann

  • Classifications not recognising parameter values which are defined in property sets

    Solved
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    1k Views
    MaxCallaghanM

    @cpreidel indeed, thanks anyways!

  • General Intersection Rule (SOL/1) - false positives with "Duplicates"

    19
    0 Votes
    19 Posts
    4k Views
    S

    Hi, thanks for replying.

    The last two pics are from “the same” file - with updated models of course.
    Some more things:
    It only occurs within those HVAC files generated with “mh-BIM” (“mh-Software” is a german company), files from other packages (Archicad, Revit, Trimble Nova) are not affected.
    While preparing the file for upload some weeks ago, I realized that the false positives are changing or vanishing depending on the models loaded by the time of checking.
    Currently there are 9 files from mh-BIM loaded. One of these checked in a separate file probably wouldn’t show the error.
    So a file with only those two elements wouldn’t show this error too.


    Stefan

  • Rule 234 - Comparing structural models

    Solved
    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    2k Views
    ?

    Hi @jcosandey,

    Maybe your problem is solved by now.
    I had some thoughts about this problem too (I need it for a project with some colleagues of yours).

    My guess is that solibri doesn’t consider your structural slab as inside the one of the two architectural slabs.
    Maybe it understands only one protrusion at the time, I don’t know.
    Hence no checking.

    You could have your 3 errors by using the intersection rule (#1).
    The strange thing is that this considers the big slabs as inside each other…
    Have a look!
    Screenshot.png
    Screenshot1.png

    What do you think about it?
    Best regards 🙂

    Mathieu

  • Application Build Error!???

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    982 Views
    tonigyllenbergT

    Hello @gkbell5,

    Usually the error indicated here is related to a problem while saving the file. In Solibri 9.10.8 we have made improvements to the saving feature, meaning that files saved with 9.10.8 should no longer have this issue (or the issue frequency should dramatically be reduced).

    Unfortunately, this does not help files saved with older versions, for which the workaround @Joel described above is the best solution.

    Kind regards,

    Toni on behalf of the Solibri team

  • Load a specific IFC Model automatically on Startup

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    777 Views
    JSNJ

    Hey @cpreidel

    I am aware that I have suggested kind of a “MacGyver approach” which may not be the most robust one but which probably would have served as a quick win. So, thx for elaborating the technical background and I am really curious how “hooking into this communication to send additional commands on top.” would work out.

    However, I would have to discuss this with my colleagues and I guess that due to the current situation there is less time for dedicating hours on a developing purpose for such a feature which is actually classified as “pretty nice to have” but not as an “absolut must” at the moment.

    Nevertheless I would be interessted to hear more about the concept you have in mind (e.g. via Python) to gain a clearer picture.

    Many thx.
    Julian

Copyright © 2025 Solibri Inc. | Powered by NodeBB