General Discussion

-nevermind

No… The second project remains without integration. Not depending in which order I have opened these two models. So the reason is not in the project. It is Autodesk… Again…

@is-dtflr
As far as I know, the gatekeeper rule only applies to the left-hand field of the rules listed below it.
So, while the left-hand field of the rule beneath the gatekeeper is filtered based on the results, the right-hand field is not.

That is why I no longer use the gatekeeper rule, and instead rely on classifications to ensure I am comparing the right components.

In the next version there will be a new option not fill sections of spaces.
The second problem of filling the openings might still not be fixed.

Hello all!

We are beginning to develop the improvements for DWG support. One thing which would certainly help, would be to test against actual customer models. Would anyone here have models that could be shared (only within our development team for development and testing purposes)? If so, please reach out to me at:

[email protected]

Kind regards,

Toni

This has now been resolved.

@Tornado23 said in Sync issues between Solibri/ACC:

Hi everyone,

We have tested issues pushpins placement in Forma coordination space where IFCs have different length units, milimeters and meters, and it works only with IFCs in milimeters. For non-milimeters IFCs pushpins are located far away.

Every IFC has unit definitions inside, so when creating federated models it does not matter whether some are in meters and some in mili or centimeters, since most IFC viewers, including Autodesk Viewer and Solibri, handle this correctly and displaying models that fit into each other.

However, I found that “Solibri’s internal unit of length is millimetres, regardless of user-defined settings”:
https://help.solibri.com/hc/en-us/articles/30962635998743-Information-Takeoff-Formulas

We have carried out tests: for IFCs in meters we have exported milimeters versions and then pushpins for issues created on them in Solibri worked fine in Forma.

It is now clear that Solibri to Forma issue placement is internally based on milimeters and question is: could it be fixed to take into consideration unit definition inside each IFC @tonigyllenberg?

I do not see BIM teams forcing everyone to work internally and export IFCs in milimeters, only for correct issue placement. Every discipline could have specific settings and needs e.g. railway in meters, steel structures in milimeters, concrete structures in centimeters etc.

Hello!

This is a valid point, we’ll test and look into this more in the coming weeks with our AutoDesk contacts as well.

@Alex-J

Another thing to look into: I found out that laptops that have a dual GPU (integrated graphics and a dedicated GPU), Windows is sometimes bugging out when you wake the PC out of sleep. When the PC goes to the sleep-state, it shuts down the dedicated GPU for battery management purposes. The thing is that it sometimes doesn’t activate the dedicated GPU when waking up for programs like Solibri…

Hi @twosk please send us your file to [email protected] for further investigations.
Thank you.

Can anyone please tell me the correct way to update a specific model in the file so that it behaves like a freshly imported file while preserving all issue links?