General Discussion

It’s just a test thing. I’m trying the out of the box templates to get inspired from them and maybe copy some good stuff.

@chris said in Checking becomes unbearable:

@BIM1337 result of this issue?

After contacting Solibri Support they requested me to try running the check with the Solibri 10 Alpha version. This greatly improved the speed and the checking wasn’t unbearable anymore.

They’d still investigate the model but haven’t given any updates on the issue. My guess is because it has a low priority, since the release of the new version is around the corner, and there, the issue is mostly fixed.

Hi. That is not normal. Hard to speculate about the reason with only this information. You could add

to the VM options file to enable debug logging level and send it to the support if the problem continues.

@lasse-lindqvist great explanation. Thanks 🙂

Hi. This could at least happen when you open Solibri, but Solibri opens in Anywhere mode due to connection issues. BLC is available in Anywhere, but only if you are logged in to the product. You can try reopening Solibri.

@BIM1337 said in Automatic issues:

@lasse-lindqvist said in Automatic issues:

Hi. It is not currently possible. Would you also want to be able to choose if it would create slides for category, result and result-component combinations, or only at the result level?

I created an internal issue #7684 about this.

I think this is possible even through the REST API isn’t it?

REST API does allow creating new slides and presentations, but REST API does not allow changing the normal behaviour of Solibri when checking is done.

In this specific case, rather than using the lining, the casing thickness should have been used in the equation.

https://standards.buildingsmart.org/IFC/RELEASE/IFC2x3/TC1/HTML/ifcsharedbldgelements/lexical/ifcdoorliningproperties.htm

However, the casing thickness 50mm is still incorrect and should actually be 77mm:
ab68d749-b56d-4f7c-be73-10c0a9fc8b5a-image.png

As you stated, overriding the complete transparency, you can see its geometry:
9cf00121-417f-478b-8927-0f3cf2cdc907-image.png

So, you are correct, that these doors aren’t modeled correctly and can’t accurately have their accessible width checked based on how the opening was modeled. The opening should have only gone to 1m without that extra portion for the casing that isn’t actually cutting/voiding the wall.

@Ricardo

I reproduced this with the officebuilding.ifc model that comes with Solibri:
3904a78f-c9b7-4516-8504-e98d08171653-image.png

I’ve logged this issue with our R&D to investigate for a fix.

Hi @Victoria-Volina ,

you have two options as far as I know,
first comes with each rule set, some of which give you the ability to categorize the issues.
For example, SOL/230/1.1, if I use GUID as cathegory I would have each component as a single category issue.9ddce14e-5a57-4b80-80c8-25efc625b9e0-image.png

Your second option is using Autorun “maxsnapshotsincategory”, please check out the Autorun Documentation
assuming your ruleset categories are setup the way you want, you can set a high limit to the category to force autorun to generate a presentation slide on each issue.
<autocomment zoom=“TRUE” maxsnapshotsincategory=“1000”/> would probably give you plenty

I would advice you to consider carefully your methodology and how you are communicating issues back to your team. Too many single issues can be overwelhming and can aslo cause you too loose sight of what you are trying to achieve.

Have fun, Cheers

@tonigyllenberg said in BCF Live insights and explanations:

Filtering
Currently, the following issues are known about filtering. Using unsupported filters will result in cancellation of the filter (and all issues to come through).

Bimsync: Filtering Undefined, in addition to other values is not supported (however filtering Undefined values alone is).
Aconex: Currently, filtering is not yet supported.

Hi,
how about the filtering with Dalux? It seems to works sometimes, sometimes not… this is quite annoying. I wish I could filter the list in Solibri.

@Victoria-Volina said in Issues to Takeoff:

But i still can’t take it to Takeoff anyway?

Correct, afaik you can’t utilize the marked information of the Issue tab in an ITO.