General Discussion

@squrn

There is an error in the rule.
Could contact the Solibri support by email?

Hi @thudelicious

Here is an article on changing the ifc class type of components in Revit. I suggest creating a IfcExportAs parameter attached to your masses and set the property value to IfcSpace.

https://www.invokeshift.com/3-ways-to-modify-the-ifc-classification-when-exporting-revit-models/

Hi
You must contact your local Solibri dealer. They can provide the school with an educational pack of Solibri.

@lasse-lindqvist Yes. You are right. Thanks so much!

Hi @plauze

Here is a ruleset that uses the comparison between property values rule to check for objects with top elevations lower than the elevations of the floors they reside on:

Level Compare.cset

You can see it finds some sinks on the wrong level:

4d425109-58da-45d2-8d00-088e0936b6a9-image.png

You’ll get false positives of components that are suppose to be below the elevation such as footings and maybe sunken slabs.

@manongrobben Hi, I did some tests, and I posted the result opening a new topic:
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1651/working-with-issues-of-multiple-clashes-bcf-live-connector?_=1638273842505

It is possible it was possible to modify them in 9.10 with BIMCollab, but in 9.12 BCF Live Connector supports only standard BCF API connections and that is the limitation there. I believe BIMCollab also dropped support for the old-style connections recently?

https://github.com/buildingSMART/BCF-API can be used to discuss if the viewpoints should be made mutable in future BCF versions.

And one possibility of course is to contact BIMCollab and see if they could make it possible to delete viewpoints.

Spooky as it seems, I don’t think I can give you a hint here…🙄
I think our dear friend at Solibri might give it a look!

@sjv-wil Thx. That is the way i wanted 🙂

@bvandalsum It does work by changing the column "name " to “type”. Many thanks for your clear instruction!

@jsn said in Numeric Sorting in ITO?:

@ricardo
Right, that is of course correct that the first column takes the lead on the first sort level, - also for values, but on a second level (for the other columns) it is only possible to sort from A-Z but not in a numeric order.

Yeah, I guess it’s not possible but only for the first…
Maybe one for the feature requests?

Hi @agroni,

With enabling debug log, it always produces the initial logs even if the software doesn’t start. It was needed for understanding which version of Solibri you are using. As you have already provided that info, I still need your email address to verify the state. Please send it to support or to private chat.
Note that, this error message appears if the credentials are wrong/if you attempted to login several times with wrong credentials.
Thank you!

The model is located close the internal origin of the authoring tool and therefore also the building storey heights are referenced according to the project origin. The survey point on the other hand is used to ensure the correct location of the elements within the IFC as this is then decisive for the IfcSite and all the relative coordinates. How are you specifiying the IfcSite, solely within the project location settings or in the SP settings as well?

The situation here is however confusing me now totally as I have double checked it with another model which has basically the same setup and there the parameter are reflected correctly (beside a minor issue). In a third one it’s for whatever reason similiar to the screen from above.

4cd9ff6f-9f96-4c3a-b63b-0fb2f0d8a395-grafik.png

So, this is now something I have to investigate further to understand the reason of this habit. At the moment it’s not really causing a big issue, but it might and what’s worrying me is that I do not really know the reason for it. If you have an explanation for this I would be happy to hear your thoughts.

Apart from that, there is just one model loaded in Solibri and for some reason it gets “split up” between 2,9 and 3k - as solely this value seperates the five foundations from the rest - which fostered my suspicion that there might be an issue with the tolerance itself. Anyhow it could be also related to the other observation, but without an answer from Solibrians we won’t know for sure.

918407a4-afa4-47f4-8798-388c2e30c1a1-grafik.png

Hi @john-lipp,

Thanks so much for your suggestions, I tried them out and found the Property Rule Template with Component Filters as a Gatekeeper tricky, as it woudl disappear from my checked Rules view as soon as the check was done (after I adapted it to my own parameters), and the Comparison Between Property Values didn’t quite react to my Project parameters as expected.
However you brought me to a new idea of how to use the Manual Checking Rule :
8885a5f1-ae46-49b6-b966-1b308fc07d7b-image.png
I include all of my own models according to their category, and search the company PSet for Attribute values with more than 32 characters.

Best Regards, Nathan

Thank you @john-lipp for your reply, now I understand what this rule does.

That means this rule doesn’t report an issue if one side of the POV is not touching the wall surface and the other side does.

Then the question is, is there a rule to check if any side of the POV is not touching the wall’s inner side?

Puting the spotlight again on this topic as clicking through the issues and additionally to the permanent scrolling to check the slides, the constant switching between the tabs of the huge coordination (buttons) and the comment tab is also very annoying. It would be better to have the possibility to have it all in a view at the same time …

baf266ac-ace8-4286-b22b-b9ae0e9a0226-grafik.png

Thanks so much for the reply! Will have a good look and let you know if I run into any more issues. Thanks again.

@john-lipp
thank you for investigating this case.
There is always the possibility to built bits and pieces. The point of modeling polygonal elements helps quite a lot in the early design stages, where components must be changed multiple times.
Therefore, the possibility to extract the correct data from such components would be helpful.