General Discussion

Hi. It is true that currently in 9.12 versions working on the same file is problematic. An upcoming version brings improvements to this (https://society.solibri.com/topic/1194/upcoming-solibri-version-testers-wanted) allowing concurrent usage of a single project file. It does not yet provide any warnings for concurrent changes, but if users coordinate, it is possible to work with a single file. And later versions can bring better coordination to this (based on demand).

@jsn
Sometimes is works after you update the model, to open a classification settings and click OK.
Than the rules thinks there are changes made and will check the new model good(more time)

Hi @JSN

I reproduced this issue and sent it to R&D.

If you multi-select a slide that has a label or responsibility set, that responsibility gets “Stuck” as being selected when you multi-select other slides, even across other presentations.

I have found in limited testing, that you can workaround the issue and still multi-select slides to set responsibilities in the communication layout by carefully watching the Responsibilities and Label columns in the Issues view while you click the incorrectly displayed responsibilities and labels in the Issue Details.

@sander-Eikelboom I send you a response to your e-mail on why the rule is not working.

Summary for whom is interested: With the original setup none components were checked. I looked like rule 9 requires a component match for both Components to Check and Allowed Property values.
In this specific case is therefore the solution to add a row to the allowed property values for the component type “object”.

The reports form solibri i imported them as a query in a other exel sheet.
With some fomula we make a good dasboard of it with a pivot table

1 issues can contain a lot of failed components.

So we used te Checked/passed/failed/accepted componets to make the dasboard
dasboard.JPG

@_c_
In the rule you can also define the report.
There stand Component/Type/Location ‘on’.
So the geometry isn’t changed, but for example the type

@mario-calcagnini
-And to clarify for everybody else; i had to pick Rule 203 to be allowed to declare the “any” operand from my Excel list. Just like mario said.

Hi Richardo!

Yes, everyone is using Solibri, but I think we found the problem. Seems to be a difference somehow if the BCF file is saved with 2.0 or 2.1. So for 2.1 it shows all objects, but when saving with 2.0 it isolates the objects as intended. Does not make to much sense for me, but at least it works with 2.0 🙂

@lasse-lindqvist I did find the log files, one of them is an “error” log file, so I will send it over to Solibri. Can’t really understand what it’s saying 🙂

@Lauri-Luoma Of course! The information I recive dfrom MagiCAD, was to have the “Export port definitions” activated in MagiCAD 2021 and with IFC 2x3. With IFC 4, it might be a bit trickier, meaning that it should be included in the export, but it can be that the information can not yet be read by Solibri. f0d3e194-c67d-4f14-aa10-9efc5215a3d8-image.png

@lasse-lindqvist That is so helpful, thank you so much!
I was beginning to think i would have to make a ruleset that outputted all components, just to get that list…😊

Did you see the replies here?
https://society.solibri.com/topic/1078/no-predefined-type-for-ifcbeam-in-solibri/7?_=1632761849501
Is it showing in an ITO?

Do I have a bad feeling that Solibri is not getting correctly the IFC Schema in the USERDEFINED level?

Good question …

@konrad
Thank you, got the email from Nava. Will aim to resolve it this week.

Hi @Matthew-Lohden

Below is an article that was updated for version 9.12.7 on coordination report templates that includes a detailed list of the keywords:

2021_08_Coordination Report Templates.pdf

@mathieu-farine Okay i understand. Interesting way to check the BIM modellers work 😀

Thank you very much @chris!

This is what I am looking for.
I tried it in many different situations and it is working.

I wish you a great day
Anees

@ricardo Great!

128 / 256 character limit?

Hi @czoog

I setup a similar check, and it doesn’t appear that the checkbox T/F value set is actually being used in the rule.

This rule is actually an API example, and looking at the code, the checkbox in the UI EffectiveCoverageAreaRuleUIDefinition sets a rpPropagateToConnectedSpaces variable in the EffectiveCoverageAreaRule.java, but this variable isn’t used in any of the other .java sources.

https://solibri.github.io/Developer-Platform/9.12.7/effectiveCoverageAreaRuleExample.html

https://github.com/Solibri/api-examples/blob/master/rule-examples/src/main/java/com/solibri/smc/api/examples/effectivecoveragearearule/EffectiveCoverageAreaRule.java

https://github.com/Solibri/api-examples/blob/master/rule-examples/src/main/java/com/solibri/smc/api/examples/effectivecoveragearearule/EffectiveCoverageAreaRuleUIDefinition.java

This rule was developed to check for ventilation coverage within rooms (travel distance occuluded)

You use I assume would be for travel distance between rooms and would travel between rooms through doors?

If you would like, you can send an email to [email protected] and I’ll pick it up to send to our R&D.

Best regards